Years spent running lathes, cutting gaskets, and packing pumps in a Minnesota machine shop can carry a hidden cost decades later. You need to know how that work exposed you to asbestos, what makes a machinist’s exposure history different from other jobs, and what your options are now, whether the diagnosis is yours or a loved one’s.
Wallace & Graham has represented workers hurt by industrial exposure, and our attorneys took one mesothelioma case to a $32.7 million jury verdict.
Every case is different and decided on its own merits. However, as a Minnesota machinists mesothelioma lawyer team, we bring that same investigation to the gasket makers, pump manufacturers, and machine builders that may be responsible for your exposure, tracing the specific products and plants tied to your career.
Contact us to walk through your work history, so you and your family can find out who is responsible and move forward with a clear plan.

| $32.7M Verdict, Finch v. Covil Corp. | 2020 Public Justice Trial Lawyer of the Year – Mona L. Wallace | Martindale-Hubbell Distinguished Rating – Bill Graham | Representing Injured Workers Since 1981 |
Machinist work rarely happened in isolation. Machine shops sat inside taconite processing plants, paper mills, and power stations where several trades handled the same asbestos-lined equipment side by side. Some Minnesota workers moved between machinist duties and these related roles over the course of a single career.
If your work history touches any of these Minnesota trades alongside machining, it can matter for identifying every source of exposure and every company that may be responsible:
You deserve a fair recovery regardless of how many companies are responsible for your asbestos exposure and mesothelioma diagnosis.
Machinists across Minnesota’s steel mills, auto plants, and machine shops handled asbestos parts as a normal part of the job, often with no warning at all. Chrysotile asbestos was built into many of the parts machinists cut, ground, and replaced by hand, and dust from that work often filled the air, creating risks from:
These exposures happened around the state, including in cities such as Minneapolis, St. Paul, Duluth, and Rochester.
Mesothelioma often does not appear until 20 to 50 years after the exposure that caused it. A diagnosis today can trace back to work done decades ago in a plant that has since closed or changed hands. That gap is why some Minnesota machinists never connect their illness to their old job until a doctor raises asbestos as the cause. Once that connection is made, the clock on your legal options starts running under Minnesota law, not on your own schedule.
In practical terms, that means the company that made the gaskets, the plant that ran without proper ventilation, and the supplier that never warned anyone can still be held accountable. But that’s only true if a claim is filed while your window is open. Waiting to see how symptoms develop is understandable, and it is also the single biggest reason valid claims run out of time. You must act before the statute of limitations expires to protect your right to compensation for things such as medical expenses, lost income, pain, suffering, and other damages.
In 2018, we achieved a $32.7 million jury verdict for a tire-plant worker diagnosed with mesothelioma. That case, like a Minnesota machinist’s case, turned on identifying exactly which asbestos-containing products caused the exposure and proving it to a jury.
| Outcome | Case Type |
| $32.7 Million Jury Verdict | Wrongful Death, Mesothelioma, Tire-Plant Worker (Finch v. Covil Corp., North Carolina, 2018) |
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in any Minnesota case. The results of your case will depend on its unique facts, available evidence, and advocacy.
As a Minnesota machinists mesothelioma attorney team, Wallace & Graham has represented workers hurt by industrial exposure since 1981. Attorney Mona Lisa Wallace and her trial team were named Public Justice’s 2020 Trial Lawyer of the Year for their work holding a large-scale factory farm operation accountable for harming nearby communities. She brings that same investigative approach to identifying the companies behind decades-old asbestos exposure in Minnesota.
Under Minn. Stat. § 541.05, negligence-based personal injury claims generally must be filed within six years of when the illness is diagnosed or reasonably discovered. Because most mesothelioma claims are brought against product manufacturers under a strict liability theory, however, Minnesota law (Minn. Stat. § 541.05, subd. 2) generally gives you only four years from that point to file. Families pursuing a wrongful death claim generally have three years from the date of death under Minn. Stat. § 573.02.
This reflects Minnesota law as of September 2026.
Minnesota machinists handled asbestos daily through gaskets, pump packing, brake and clutch grinding, and machined parts on lathes and mills. This often occurred in plants across the state built before the 1980s, including in Minneapolis, St. Paul, Duluth, and Rochester.
Yes, you may be able to file a claim in some cases. Many companies that made asbestos gaskets and machine parts set up trust funds through bankruptcy specifically to pay these claims, and a closed employer does not block a claim against the product makers that supplied the asbestos parts.
The statute of limitations described above gives you a limited amount of time to file a claim. The time you have depends on the legal theory of your case. Generally, negligence claims must be filed within six years of diagnosis or reasonable discovery of illness, product liability claims must be filed within four years, and wrongful death claims must be filed within three years.
Minnesota machinists and their families can pursue medical costs, lost income, and pain and suffering through a lawsuit or an asbestos trust fund claim. Our attorneys will gather evidence to prove the dollar value of your damages and fiercely advocate for your full and fair recovery.
No. Family members who washed a machinist’s work clothes, or who spent time in a home where asbestos dust traveled on clothing and tools, can develop mesothelioma from that secondhand exposure and may have their own claim. We work with Minnesota machinists, their families, and others who developed mesothelioma from asbestos exposure.
Missing records do not end a claim. Union files, Social Security earnings records, pension archives, and coworker statements can often reconstruct where and how a machinist was exposed, even at a plant that closed decades ago.
Yes. Family members can bring a wrongful death claim after losing a loved one to mesothelioma, seeking compensation for funeral costs, lost financial support, and the loss of that person’s companionship. However, your time to file a claim is limited by the Minnesota wrongful death statute of limitations.
Not necessarily. Many machinists worked at plants in Minnesota and elsewhere over a career, and a claim can often still be filed in Minnesota depending on where you live, where you were exposed, or where the responsible companies operate.
If any of this sounds like your situation, contact us and we will walk through your work history together so that you can make an informed decision about what to do next.
You do not have to sort through decades of work history alone. Fill out our contact form and tell us about your machinist career in Minnesota, the plants where you worked, the parts you handled, and your current health. We will help you find out who is responsible for your asbestos exposure and mesothelioma diagnosis and what compensation you may be owed.